This is an updated copy of the version on BadHistory. I plan to update it in accordance with the feedback I got.
I'd like to thank two people who will remain anonymous for helping me greatly with this post (you know who you are)
Three years ago a festschrift for Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri was published by Shubhra Chakrabarti, a history teacher at the University of Delhi and Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist who taught at JNU until 2010.
One of the essays in the festschirt by Utsa Patnaik was an attempt to quantify the "drain" undergone by India during British Rule. Her conclusion? Britain robbed India of $45 trillion (or £9.2 trillion) during their 200 or so years of rule. This figure was immensely popular, and got republished in several major news outlets (here, here, here, here (they get the number wrong) and more recently here), got a mention from the Minister of External Affairs & returns 29,100 results on Google. There's also plenty of references to it here on Reddit.
Patnaik is not the first to calculate such a figure. Angus Maddison thought it was £100 million, Simon Digby said £1 billion, Javier Estaban said £40 million see Roy (2019). The huge range of figures should set off some alarm bells.
So how did Patnaik calculate this (shockingly large) figure? Well, even though I don't have access to the festschrift, she conveniently has written an article detailing her methodology here. Let's have a look.

How exactly did the British manage to diddle us and drain our wealth’ ? was the question that Basudev Chatterjee (later editor of a volume in the Towards Freedom project) had posed to me 50 years ago when we were fellow-students abroad.

This is begging the question.

After decades of research I find that using India’s commodity export surplus as the measure and applying an interest rate of 5%, the total drain from 1765 to 1938, compounded up to 2016, comes to £9.2 trillion; since $4.86 exchanged for £1 those days, this sum equals about $45 trillion.

This is completely meaningless. To understand why it's meaningless consider India's annual coconut exports. These are almost certainly a surplus but the surplus in trade is countered by the other country buying the product (indeed, by definition, trade surpluses contribute to the GDP of a nation which hardly plays into intuitive conceptualisations of drain).
Furthermore, Dewey (2019) critiques the 5% interest rate.

She [Patnaik] consistently adopts statistical assumptions (such as compound interest at a rate of 5% per annum over centuries) that exaggerate the magnitude of the drain

Moving on:

The exact mechanism of drain, or transfers from India to Britain was quite simple.

Convenient.

Drain theory possessed the political merit of being easily grasped by a nation of peasants. [...] No other idea could arouse people than the thought that they were being taxed so that others in far off lands might live in comfort. [...] It was, therefore, inevitable that the drain theory became the main staple of nationalist political agitation during the Gandhian era.

- Chandra et al. (1989)

The key factor was Britain’s control over our taxation revenues combined with control over India’s financial gold and forex earnings from its booming commodity export surplus with the world. Simply put, Britain used locally raised rupee tax revenues to pay for its net import of goods, a highly abnormal use of budgetary funds not seen in any sovereign country.

The issue with figures like these is they all make certain methodological assumptions that are impossible to prove. From Roy in Frankema et al. (2019):

the "drain theory" of Indian poverty cannot be tested with evidence, for several reasons. First, it rests on the counterfactual that any money saved on account of factor payments abroad would translate into domestic investment, which can never be proved. Second, it rests on "the primitive notion that all payments to foreigners are "drain"", that is, on the assumption that these payments did not contribute to domestic national income to the equivalent extent (Kumar 1985, 384; see also Chaudhuri 1968). Again, this cannot be tested. [...] Fourth, while British officers serving India did receive salaries that were many times that of the average income in India, a paper using cross-country data shows that colonies with better paid officers were governed better (Jones 2013).

Indeed, drain theory rests on some very weak foundations. This, in of itself, should be enough to dismiss any of the other figures that get thrown out. Nonetheless, I felt it would be a useful exercise to continue exploring Patnaik's take on drain theory.

The East India Company from 1765 onwards allocated every year up to one-third of Indian budgetary revenues net of collection costs, to buy a large volume of goods for direct import into Britain, far in excess of that country’s own needs.

So what's going on here? Well Roy (2019) explains it better:

Colonial India ran an export surplus, which, together with foreign investment, was used to pay for services purchased from Britain. These payments included interest on public debt, salaries, and pensions paid to government offcers who had come from Britain, salaries of managers and engineers, guaranteed profts paid to railway companies, and repatriated business profts. How do we know that any of these payments involved paying too much? The answer is we do not.

So what was really happening is the government was paying its workers for services (as well as guaranteeing profits - to promote investment - something the GoI does today Dalal (2019), and promoting business in India), and those workers were remitting some of that money to Britain. This is hardly a drain (unless, of course, Indian diaspora around the world today are "draining" it). In some cases, the remittances would take the form of goods (as described) see Chaudhuri (1983):

It is obvious that these debit items were financed through the export surplus on merchandise account, and later, when railway construction started on a large scale in India, through capital import. Until 1833 the East India Company followed a cumbersome method in remitting the annual home charges. This was to purchase export commodities in India out of revenue, which were then shipped to London and the proceeds from their sale handed over to the home treasury.

While Roy's earlier point argues better paid officers governed better, it is honestly impossible to say what part of the repatriated export surplus was a drain, and what was not. However calling all of it a drain is definitely misguided.
It's worth noting that Patnaik seems to make no attempt to quantify the benefits of the Raj either, Dewey (2019)'s 2nd criticism:

she [Patnaik] consistently ignores research that would tend to cut the economic impact of the drain down to size, such as the work on the sources of investment during the industrial revolution (which shows that industrialisation was financed by the ploughed-back profits of industrialists) or the costs of empire school (which stresses the high price of imperial defence)

​

Since tropical goods were highly prized in other cold temperate countries which could never produce them, in effect these free goods represented international purchasing power for Britain which kept a part for its own use and re-exported the balance to other countries in Europe and North America against import of food grains, iron and other goods in which it was deficient.

Re-exports necessarily adds value to goods when the goods are processed and when the goods are transported. The country with the largest navy at the time would presumably be in very good stead to do the latter.

The British historians Phyllis Deane and WA Cole presented an incorrect estimate of Britain’s 18th-19th century trade volume, by leaving out re-exports completely. I found that by 1800 Britain’s total trade was 62% higher than their estimate, on applying the correct definition of trade including re-exports, that is used by the United Nations and by all other international organisations.

While interesting, and certainly expected for such an old book, re-exporting necessarily adds value to goods.

When the Crown took over from the Company, from 1861 a clever system was developed under which all of India’s financial gold and forex earnings from its fast-rising commodity export surplus with the world, was intercepted and appropriated by Britain. As before up to a third of India’s rising budgetary revenues was not spent domestically but was set aside as ‘expenditure abroad’.

So, what does this mean? Britain appropriated all of India's earnings, and then spent a third of it aboard? Not exactly. She is describing home charges see Roy (2019) again:

Some of the expenditures on defense and administration were made in sterling and went out of the country. This payment by the government was known as the Home Charges. For example, interest payment on loans raised to finance construction of railways and irrigation works, pensions paid to retired officers, and purchase of stores, were payments in sterling. [...] almost all money that the government paid abroad corresponded to the purchase of a service from abroad. [...] The balance of payments system that emerged after 1800 was based on standard business principles. India bought something and paid for it. State revenues were used to pay for wages of people hired abroad, pay for interest on loans raised abroad, and repatriation of profits on foreign investments coming into India. These were legitimate market transactions.

Indeed, if paying for what you buy is drain, then several billions of us are drained every day.

The Secretary of State for India in Council, based in London, invited foreign importers to deposit with him the payment (in gold, sterling and their own currencies) for their net imports from India, and these gold and forex payments disappeared into the yawning maw of the SoS’s account in the Bank of England.

It should be noted that India having two heads was beneficial, and encouraged investment per Roy (2019):

The fact that the India Office in London managed a part of the monetary system made India creditworthy, stabilized its currency, and encouraged foreign savers to put money into railways and private enterprise in India. Current research on the history of public debt shows that stable and large colonies found it easier to borrow abroad than independent economies because the investors trusted the guarantee of the colonist powers.

​

Against India’s net foreign earnings he issued bills, termed Council bills (CBs), to an equivalent rupee value. The rate (between gold-linked sterling and silver rupee) at which the bills were issued, was carefully adjusted to the last farthing, so that foreigners would never find it more profitable to ship financial gold as payment directly to Indians, compared to using the CB route. Foreign importers then sent the CBs by post or by telegraph to the export houses in India, that via the exchange banks were paid out of the budgeted provision of sums under ‘expenditure abroad’, and the exporters in turn paid the producers (peasants and artisans) from whom they sourced the goods.

Sunderland (2013) argues CBs had two main roles (and neither were part of a grand plot to keep gold out of India):

Council bills had two roles. They firstly promoted trade by handing the IO some control of the rate of exchange and allowing the exchange banks to remit funds to India and to hedge currency transaction risks. They also enabled the Indian government to transfer cash to England for the payment of its UK commitments.

​

The United Nations (1962) historical data for 1900 to 1960, show that for three decades up to 1928 (and very likely earlier too) India posted the second highest merchandise export surplus in the world, with USA in the first position. Not only were Indians deprived of every bit of the enormous international purchasing power they had earned over 175 years, even its rupee equivalent was not issued to them since not even the colonial government was credited with any part of India’s net gold and forex earnings against which it could issue rupees. The sleight-of-hand employed, namely ‘paying’ producers out of their own taxes, made India’s export surplus unrequited and constituted a tax-financed drain to the metropolis, as had been correctly pointed out by those highly insightful classical writers, Dadabhai Naoroji and RCDutt.

It doesn't appear that others appreciate their insight Roy (2019):

K. N. Chaudhuri rightly calls such practice ‘confused’ economics ‘coloured by political feelings’.

​

Surplus budgets to effect such heavy tax-financed transfers had a severe employment–reducing and income-deflating effect: mass consumption was squeezed in order to release export goods. Per capita annual foodgrains absorption in British India declined from 210 kg. during the period 1904-09, to 157 kg. during 1937-41, and to only 137 kg by 1946.

Dewey (1978) points out reliability issues with Indian agriculutural statistics, however this calorie decline persists to this day. Some of it is attributed to less food being consumed at home Smith (2015), a lower infectious disease burden Duh & Spears (2016) and diversified diets Vankatesh et al. (2016).

If even a part of its enormous foreign earnings had been credited to it and not entirely siphoned off, India could have imported modern technology to build up an industrial structure as Japan was doing.

This is, unfortunately, impossible to prove. Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication that India would've united (this is arguably more plausible than the given counterfactual¹). Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication India would not have been nuked in WW2, much like Japan. Had the British not arrived in India, there is no clear indication India would not have been invaded by lizard people, much like Japan. The list continues eternally.
Nevertheless, I will charitably examine the given counterfactual anyway. Did pre-colonial India have industrial potential? The answer is a resounding no.
From Gupta (1980):

This article starts from the premise that while economic categories - the extent of commodity production, wage labour, monetarisation of the economy, etc - should be the basis for any analysis of the production relations of pre-British India, it is the nature of class struggles arising out of particular class alignments that finally gives the decisive twist to social change. Arguing on this premise, and analysing the available evidence, this article concludes that there was little potential for industrial revolution before the British arrived in India because, whatever might have been the character of economic categories of that period, the class relations had not sufficiently matured to develop productive forces and the required class struggle for a 'revolution' to take place.

A view echoed in Raychaudhuri (1983):

Yet all of this did not amount to an economic situation comparable to that of western Europe on the eve of the industrial revolution. Her technology - in agriculture as well as manufacturers - had by and large been stagnant for centuries. [...] The weakness of the Indian economy in the mid-eighteenth century, as compared to pre-industrial Europe was not simply a matter of technology and commercial and industrial organization. No scientific or geographical revolution formed part of the eighteenth-century Indian's historical experience. [...] Spontaneous movement towards industrialisation is unlikely in such a situation.

So now we've established India did not have industrial potential, was India similar to Japan just before the Meiji era? The answer, yet again, unsurprisingly, is no. Japan's economic situation was not comparable to India's, which allowed for Japan to finance its revolution. From Yasuba (1986):

All in all, the Japanese standard of living may not have been much below the English standard of living before industrialization, and both of them may have been considerably higher than the Indian standard of living. We can no longer say that Japan started from a pathetically low economic level and achieved a rapid or even "miraculous" economic growth. Japan's per capita income was almost as high as in Western Europe before industrialization, and it was possible for Japan to produce surplus in the Meiji Period to finance private and public capital formation.

The circumstances that led to Meiji Japan were extremely unique. See Tomlinson (1985):

Most modern comparisons between India and Japan, written by either Indianists or Japanese specialists, stress instead that industrial growth in Meiji Japan was the product of unique features that were not reproducible elsewhere. [...] it is undoubtably true that Japan's progress to industrialization has been unique and unrepeatable

So there you have it. Unsubstantiated statistical assumptions, calling any number you can a drain & assuming a counterfactual for no good reason gets you this $45 trillion number. Hopefully that's enough to bury it in the ground.
^{1. Several authors have affirmed that Indian identity is a colonial artefact. For example see Rajan 1969:}

^{Perhaps the single greatest and most enduring impact of British rule over India is that it created an Indian nation, in the modern political sense. After centuries of rule by different dynasties overparts of the Indian sub-continent, and after about 100 years of British rule, Indians ceased to be merely Bengalis, Maharashtrians,or Tamils, linguistically and culturally.}

^{or see Bryant 2000:}

^{But then, it would be anachronistic to condemn eighteenth-century Indians, who served the British, as collaborators, when the notion of 'democratic' nationalism or of an Indian 'nation' did not then exist. [...] Indians who fought for them, differed from the Europeans in having a primary attachment to a non-belligerent religion, family and local chief, which was stronger than any identity they might have with a more remote prince or 'nation'.}

Bibliography

Chakrabarti, Shubra & Patnaik, Utsa (2018). Agrarian and other histories: Essays for Binay Bhushan Chaudhuri. Colombia University Press
Hickel, Jason (2018). How the British stole $45 trillion from India. The Guardian
Bhuyan, Aroonim & Sharma, Krishan (2019). The Great Loot: How the British stole $45 trillion from India. Indiapost
Monbiot, George (2020). English Landowners have stolen our rights. It is time to reclaim them. The Guardian
Tsjeng, Zing (2020). How Britain Stole $45 trillion from India with trains | Empires of Dirt. Vice
Chaudhury, Dipanjan (2019). British looted $45 trillion from India in today’s value: Jaishankar. The Economic Times
Roy, Tirthankar (2019). How British rule changed India's economy: The Paradox of the Raj. Palgrave Macmillan
Patnaik, Utsa (2018). How the British impoverished India. Hindustan Times
Tuovila, Alicia (2019). Expenditure method. Investopedia
Dewey, Clive (2019). Changing the guard: The dissolution of the nationalist–Marxist orthodoxy in the agrarian and agricultural history of India. The Indian Economic & Social History Review
Chandra, Bipan et al. (1989). India's Struggle for Independence, 1857-1947. Penguin Books
Frankema, Ewout & Booth, Anne (2019). Fiscal Capacity and the Colonial State in Asia and Africa, c. 1850-1960. Cambridge University Press
Dalal, Sucheta (2019). IL&FS Controversy: Centre is Paying Up on Sovereign Guarantees to ADB, KfW for Group's Loan. TheWire
Chaudhuri, K.N. (1983). X - Foreign Trade and Balance of Payments (1757–1947). Cambridge University Press
Sunderland, David (2013). Financing the Raj: The City of London and Colonial India, 1858-1940. Boydell Press
Dewey, Clive (1978). Patwari and Chaukidar: Subordinate officials and the reliability of India’s agricultural statistics. Athlone Press
Smith, Lisa (2015). The great Indian calorie debate: Explaining rising undernourishment during India’s rapid economic growth. Food Policy
Duh, Josephine & Spears, Dean (2016). Health and Hunger: Disease, Energy Needs, and the Indian Calorie Consumption Puzzle. The Economic Journal
Vankatesh, P. et al. (2016). Relationship between Food Production and Consumption Diversity in India – Empirical Evidences from Cross Section Analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review
Gupta, Shaibal (1980). Potential of Industrial Revolution in Pre-British India. Economic and Political Weekly
Raychaudhuri, Tapan (1983). I - The mid-eighteenth-century background. Cambridge University Press
Yasuba, Yasukichi (1986). Standard of Living in Japan Before Industrialization: From what Level did Japan Begin? A Comment. The Journal of Economic History
Tomblinson, B.R. (1985). Writing History Sideways: Lessons for Indian Economic Historians from Meiji Japan. Cambridge University Press
Rajan, M.S. (1969). The Impact of British Rule in India. Journal of Contemporary History
Bryant, G.J. (2000). Indigenous Mercenaries in the Service of European Imperialists: The Case of the Sepoys in the Early British Indian Army, 1750-1800. War in History

Google Trader Review 2015 - GOOGLE TRADER?? Discover the SECRETS about Google Trader in this Google Trader review! So Exactly what is Google Trader Software all about? Does Google Trader Actually Work? Is Google Trader Software application scam or does it really work?
To discover answers to these concerns continue reading my in depth and honest Google Trader Review below.
Google Trader Description:
Name: Google Trader
Niche: Binary Options.
Ben William has created a This Amazing Trading Software called “Google Trader” The software works on autopilot and place's the winning trades on big markets and stocks like eBay, Yahoo, Facebook and Google and few other big stocks like Coca Cola etc..
You just have to activate it and DONE, It will do the rest of lifting if self..
Official Website: Activate The NEW Google Trader System!! CLICK HERE NOW!!!
Exactly what is Google Trader?
Google Trader is basically a binary options trading software that is created to help traders win and predict the marketplace trends with binary options. The software likewise offers analyses of the market conditions so that traders can understand what should be your next step. It provides different secret methods that ultimately assists. traders without using any complex trading indications or follow charts.
Google Trader Binary Options Trading Method
Base the GoogleTrader 2015 trading method. After you see it working, you can start to implement your technique with regular sized lots. This approach will certainly settle gradually. Every Forex binary options trader should pick an account type that is in accordance with their requirements and expectations. A larger account does not imply a larger profit potential so it is a great idea to begin little and quickly add to your account as your returns increase based upon the winning trading selections the software makes.
Binary Options Trading
To help you trade binary options properly, it is necessary to have an understanding behind the fundamentals of Binary Options Trading. Currency Trading, or foreign exchange, is based on the perceived value of 2 currencies pairs to one another, and is affected by the political stability of the country, inflation and interest rates to name a few things. Keep this in mind as you trade and learn more about binary options to optimize your learning experience.
Things That You Need To Know About Google Trader:
Google Algorithm
Google Trader is an Auto Trading software that based on Google’s Search Engine algorithm!
Google Trader is Up to 96.47% Accurate.
Auto Trading Software
100% Proven Auto Trading Software – verified by brokers!
Private Community
Watch the live results all verified by an independent party
Updates & News
Google Trader's database is updated every 10 seconds in order to always have the most profitable market opportunities!
Google Trader Summary
In summary, there are some evident ideas that have actually been checked in time, in addition to some more recent techniques. that you might not have actually thought about. Ideally, as long as you follow what we recommend in this short article you can either get going with trading with Google Trader or improve on what you have actually already done.
GoogleTrader is the Most Advanced and Most Accurate trading bot ever Released!
You will be Amazed to see that..
Google Trader is 100% Legit and super Easy to Setup..
You Don’t Need Any Experience.. or IT Skills..
But there Is Only A Very Limited Spaces Available
So Act Now Before It's Too Late
Click Here To Claim Your Google Trader LIFETIME User License!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tags: Google Trader app, Google Trader information, Google Trader url, Google Trader website, Google Trader youtube video, Google Trader trading software, get Google Trader, article about Google Trader, Google Trader computer program, Google Trader the truth, Google Trader support, Google Trader support email address, Google Trader help desk, similar than Google Trader, better than Google Trader, Google Trader contact, Google Trader demo, Google Trader video tutorial, how does Google Trader work, is Google Trader system the best online is Google Trader a scam, does Google Trader really work, does Google Trader actually work, Google Trader members area, Google Trader login page, Google Trader verification, Google Trader software reviews, Google Trader no fake review, Google Trader Live Broadcast, is Google Trader real, Google Trader forex trading, Google Trader binary options trading, Google Trader automated app, the Google Trader review, Google Trader signals, Google Trader mac os x, Google Trader broker sign up, Google Trader free download, reviews of Google Trader, Google Trader live results, Google Trader bonus, Google Trader honest review, Google Trader 2015, is Google Trader worth the risk, Google Trader pc desktop, Google Trader free trial,Google Trader system testimonial, Google Trader scam watch dog, Google Trader warrior forum, Google Trader web version, Google Trader open a account, Google Trader laptop, Google Trader revised Method 2015, Google Trader Unbiased review, is Google Trader all hype?, real people invested in Google Trader, is Google Trader a shame, Google Trader discount, Google Trader binary option watch dog review, Google Trader youtube, seriously will Google Trader work, Google Trader facebook, Google Trader activation code, Google Trader 2015 Working, Google Trader twitter, Google Trader currency trading, Google Trader real person review, Google Trader example trade, will Google Trader system work on mobile phone, Completely New Google Trader, Google Trader customer service, new Google Trader, Google Trader webinar, gtrader.co,gtrader.co review,gtrader.co reviews, Google Trader webinar replay, Google Trader anybody using this, Google Trader real or fake, is Google Trader live trades real, Google Trader is this a scam, is Google Trader reliable?, Google Trader By Ben Williams Review, Google Trader Ben William Reviews,Google Trader honest reviews, Google Trader is it a scam, Google Trader download software, Google Trader app review, Google Trader software download, Google Trader forum, Google Trader signals, Google Trader download page, Google Trader software demo somebody using it, Google Trader binary software, Google Trader binary options review, Google Trader members, Google Trader scam or legit,Google Trader comments, minimum deposit for Google Trader, Google Trader reviews, Google Trader binary today, Google Trader system pro review, Google Trader windows 7, Google Trader windows 8 and windows XP, Google Trader scam or real, Google Trader login, Google Trader has anybody out there made any money out of it?, Google Trader vip membership pass, does Google Trader work on autopilot?, Google Trader price, is Google Trader a scam or not, will Google Trader help me, real truth about Google Trader, Google Trader System, Google Trader inside members page, Google Trader software downloads, how to download Google Trader, how to access Google Trader, Google Trader Robot, how to use Google Trader, how to trade with Google Trader, Google Trader NEWS Update and details, Google Trader sign in, the Google Trader trading options, Google Trader info, Google Trader information, Google Trader searching for new winning trades, Google Trader today, Google Trader feedback, Google Trader real user review, Google Trader customer reviews, Google Trader consumer review, Google Trader Review 2015, insider john Google Trader review, george s Google Trader review, Google Trader doesn't work, is Google Trader system another scam or legit, Google Trader refund, Activate Google Trader, review of Google Trader, log on to Google Trader, is Google Trader manual binary trading, Google Trader bot review, GoogleTrader test, Google Trader explanation, what brokers work with Google Trader software, what is Google Trader, Google Trader news, new version of Google Trader, Google Trader fan Page, Google Trader breaking news, Google Trader Register, Google Trader sign up, Google Trader broker sign up, Google Trader real proof, how to activate auto trading on Google Trader,Google Trader robot, Google Trader members area, Google Trader sign in, web version Google Trader, should i use Google Trader, Google Trader yes or no, do i need trading experience, Google Trader create account, GoogleTrader instructions, how to get a Google Trader demo, Google Trader special, desktop Google Trader, Google Trader Secret method, Join Google Trader, Google Trader ea trading app, Google Trader limited time, Google Trader pros and cons, Google Trader bad reviews, is Google Trader software automatic binary trading, Google Trader negative and positive review, Google Trader Author, Google Trader creator, who made Google Trader, what is the Google Trader, Google Trader real review, GoogleTrader broker, Google Trader sign up broker, Google Trader sign up broker review, Google Trader fund broker, Google Trader how to fund broker,Google Trader deposit funds into broker, how does Google Trader trade, Google Trader trading bot, what is Google Trader and cost?, Google Trader strategy, Google Trader password reset, Google Trader beta tester, Google Trader comparison, GoogleTrader questions and answers, rate & review Google Trader, rate and reviews Google Trader, is Google Trader site legit?, Google Trader reviews online, is Google Trader for real, Google Trader login page, Google Trader results, Google Trader winning and losing trades, Google Trader overview, Google Trader training, how to setup Google Trader, Google Trader home, real testimonial on Google Trader system, Google Trader real time trading, start trading with Google Trader, Google Trader proof, Google Trader the truth, Get Google Trader, Google Trader Review
I highly recommend “Google Trader” to my friends, Specially Those, Who are looking for online residual income source.. Hurry Up ! Don’t waste your time
Get it Now ** **Click Here To Download Google Trader Right NOW!

Rejection and negativity Forex Income Boss Review stuff that network entrepreneurs face regularly.

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTACT ACCES TO Forex Income Boss FOR FREE!](http://www.gonextstep.net/ForexIncomeBoss)

If you have not experienced it as a network marketer it's either you Forex Income Boss Review new and have not started recruiting people to your new business opportunity or have not started at all.
Even if you Forex Income Boss Review new or have been in the system for a long time, this is your opportunity to learn how to deal with negative people when recruiting them for your home business.
There's many challenges network marketing business men and women face when they decide to start their home business - The most common of them all is falling victims to negative people when recruiting.
This negativity is capable of killing your aspiration just as quickly as your excitement went through the roof when you heard about the business opportunity and about succeeding within this industry. This is a hurdle that many don't get over with and if you don't know how to deal with it now, it may destabilize you and you may not recover from it, when it hits you.
These negative people can actually make you regret the reason why you choose to find financial freedom through network marketing; they will make you feel you're making the greatest mistake of your existence by doing home based business.
If they Forex Income Boss Review this bad, how can you handle negative people when recruiting and building your business? Who Is A Negative Person?
There Forex Income Boss Review people in our life that frequently make mockery of each and every goals we have and every move we make in achieving them, most times they Forex Income Boss Review our friends and family, co-workers, in few occasions strangers and the person you want to recruit into your home business. >>> CLICK HERE TO GET INSTACT ACCES TO Forex Income Boss FOR FREE!
Therefore a negative person can be define as a person that talk badly, or in a non-positive way about your dreams, goals and how you plan on accomplishing them.
I want you to understand one fact about negative people; sometimes it maybe your friends and family you love probably the most and who we believe could be most available to listen to our newly discovered business venture could possibly be the most hurtful.
They Forex Income Boss Review fully aw Forex Income Boss Review us, they Forex Income Boss Review fully aw Forex Income Boss Review of our past, they Forex Income Boss Review fully aw Forex Income Boss Review of our qualities greater than any stranger, and it is that insight that may cause them to assume they Forex Income Boss Review able to predict just how much success or failure we'll have.
They think they know your strength due to what you have carried out previously which they use to calculate your future.
Don't let other peoples preconceived notions deter you from what you desire in life.
When your family members, friends, or prospects Forex Income Boss Review being negative about your network marketing business, or don't want anything to do with it until they see you have some success, don't falter, just stay focused on what made you want to build a business for yourself in the first place.
Don't allow other peoples' notions and believe about you, put you off that which you desire in life. Whenever your friends and family, or the people you want to recruit Forex Income Boss Review being negative regarding your home business, or do not want anything related to it until they see you possess some success, don't get discouraged, just remain focused and know you Forex Income Boss Review building your business for you and your family and not for them, when you get some level of success in the business they will be the one running after you and not the other way round.
Would getting 2000 additional site visitors each day improve your business? Obviously it would.
Just how much would those visitors mean for your business? Let's say you could have an additional sale per week, and you repeat that each week? Just think about the additional earnings you'd create at the end of every month.
You should understand how to drive a regular stream of top quality leads to your website, and also, since company duplicated sites and lead capture pages don't show up around the search engines like Google, how can you develop an online system that drives leads through quality content? Content is like the new currency online, but anyone can create content.
The important thing is getting visitors or traffic is exactly what you need to do once you make your content. >>> CLICK HERE TO GET INSTACT ACCES TO Forex Income Boss FOR FREE!
. . . . . . . . Are You Looking For A Forex Income Boss Alternative?? CLICK HERE NOW! Tags: Forex Income Boss app, Forex Income Boss information, Forex Income Boss url, Forex Income Boss website, Forex Income Boss trading software, get Forex Income Boss, article about Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss computer program Forex Income Boss support, Forex Income Boss support email address, Forex Income Boss help desk, similar than Forex Income Boss, better than Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss contact, Forex Income Boss demo, Forex Income Boss video tutorial, how does Forex Income Boss work, is Forex Income Boss the best online is Forex Income Boss a scam, does Forex Income Boss really work, does Forex Income Boss actually work, Forex Income Boss members area, Forex Income Boss login page, Forex Income Boss verification, Forex Income Boss software review, Forex Income Boss no fake review, is Forex Income Boss real, Forex Income Boss forex trading, Forex Income Boss binary options trading, Forex Income Boss automated app, Forex Income Boss signals, Forex Income Boss mac os x, Forex Income Boss broker sign up, Forex Income Boss free download, Forex Income Boss bonus, Forex Income Boss honest review, Forex Income Boss 2015, is Forex Income Boss worth the risk, Forex Income Boss pc desktop, Forex Income Boss testimonial, Forex Income Boss warrior forum, Forex Income Boss web version, Forex Income Boss open a account, Forex Income Boss laptop Forex Income Boss discount, Forex Income Boss youtube, seriously will Forex Income Boss work, Forex Income Boss facebook, Forex Income Boss twitter, Forex Income Boss currency trading, Forex Income Boss example trade, will Forex Income Boss work on mobile phone, new Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss webinar, will Forex Income Boss help me, real truth about Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss System, inside members page, how to download Forex Income Boss, how to access Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss Robot, how to use Forex Income Boss, how to trade with Forex Income Boss By Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss today, Forex Income Boss feedback, Forex Income Boss real user review, Forex Income Boss customer reviews, Forex Income Boss Auto Click Software consumer review, Forex Income Boss doesn't work, is Forex Income Boss another scam or legit, Forex Income Boss test, Forex Income Boss explanation By Forex Income Boss, what is Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss news, new version of Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss fan Page, should i use Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss yes or no, do i need trading experience By Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss create account, Forex Income Boss instructions, Forex Income Boss Secret method, Join Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss ea trading app, Forex Income Boss limited time, Forex Income Boss pros and cons Auto Click Software, Forex Income Boss negative and positive review, Real Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss creator, who made Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss strategy, Forex Income Boss password reset, Forex Income Boss beta tester, Forex Income Boss comparison, Forex Income Boss results, Forex Income Boss winning and losing trades, Forex Income Boss overview, Forex Income Boss training, how to setup Forex Income Boss, start trading with Forex Income Boss, Forex Income Boss proof, Forex Income Boss the truth, Forex Income Boss Review
Click Here To Download Forex Income Boss V2 Right NOW!