🤔Have the #Bitcoin and Forex Traders been friending your pages🤦🏾♀️ Wonder what the hype is about? 💱Basically- Forex is a simultaneous transaction, where one currency is traded for another in real time🌏This is a very large market entity that is based on liquid financials #eBook #LinkInBio
An inscribed gold-inlaid bronze tiger tally (Hufu), Qin dynasty (221 BC–206 BC) or later. Length 3⅞ in., 9.8 cm. Sold at Sotheby's in 2022 for 869,400 USD. [2048x2048]
[OptaJohan] 9 - Pascal Jansen won nine Eredivisie games against Ajax, PSV or Feyenoord as AZ-manager, the second-highest tally for an AZ-coach in the league's history (Georg Keßler 10).
[Globo Esporte] At 26 years and 5 days old, Gabriel Barbosa became the youngest player ever to reach the 100 goal tally for the Brazilian League. 42 total goals for Santos, 58 total goals for Flamengo and 2 golden boots in 9 seasons at the league.
Håland would need to score 9 more goals in his next 2 matches to match Marco Negri's tally for his first 10 league matches with Rangers
That's a pretty eye-opening stat. Different league and quality of opposition of course between the two. clearly Håland is scoring in a farmer's league.
In the last 9 years, I've somehow managed to never send any crypto to a wrong address. Here's 5 things I always do to make sure I never mess up a transaction.
I've been in crypto for 9 years, and I've done hundreds of transactions in over 30 different cryptocurrencies, including purchases. The more different currencies you use, the more different type of wallets and transactions you have to deal with. If you always use the same 2-3 cryptos, it's definitely gonna be much easier. Number of times I've sent anything to the wrong address in the last 9 years: 0. It's not because I'm that bright, or have any special attention to details. I make a lot of mistakes like everyone else. It's because I do these 4 things (and the 5th one in some select cases):
Check that you are using the correct currency. That's an easy one. But if you use things that have similar logos or names, like BTC and BCH, it's a simple matter of double checking.
Don't type out any address, copy and paste it, or QR code it. It cuts out the bulk of the errors people make. The few people I know that messed up, have all for some crazy reason typed out the address.
Double check the first few and last characters. You don't even have to check the entire address. If you have the beginning and the end, you have the whole address. If anything got cut off, it would typically be the end. And the only time I've ever had an incomplete address, is when I had to copy and paste it manually, by selecting the address. As opposed to having to just click the copy and paste clipboard.
Do a small test transaction first for important transactions. You may not have the safety net of a bank in between, but you can make your own safety net. For most crypto, the cost will be very small. But if you transfer any important amounts, it's safer to do a test first. Especially on a new wallet. My test transactions have been correct for 100% of my transactions, so you could make the argument that they've all been redundant, but if it can give you peace of mind, then it's worth it. And when sending big amounts, you don't want to take any chances. It might seem like a redundant step, but it gives you an extra safety net. The only exception where I might not do this is for purchases (they usually have a lot less risk), on saved wallets, small transactions with coins I'm already very familiar with.
This one is only for some cases. And it's the only time I've come close to making a mistake. For some coins, you may have extra steps, in the same way when you do a wire. Things like a network you have to select or have a note/memo to get to the right account. That's something you would see more on exchanges. In most cases, what you need to do is explained, it will warn you that you have to do this, and it's still simple enough. If you're transferring a new coin, always double check that there's no extras like this. Especially if you send funds to an exchange. And I'll double check the instructions in a google search.
When in doubt about anything, look it up before transferring. You wouldn't just guess and not double check a bank wire form when you send a wire. Treat a crypto transaction like a bank wire. You're not sending an IOU like when you do a credit card transaction. Crypto transactions are a true and pure form of transaction.
Alden’s Smith Management LLC took out massive PPP loans that were forgiven. The law firm managing Homes of America’s transactions in at least WV (Williams, Mullen, Clark, and Dobbins) took out more than $9 million in forgiven PPP loans. We only got $1800 in support.
FINRA October 2022 disciplinary report: 'between August 2017 and May 2019, Morgan Stanley reported approximately 9.6 million transactions in National Market System (NMS) securities without a required short sale indicator.' Discipline? $250,000 fine without admitting or denying the findings.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (CRD #8209, New York, New York) August 17, 2022 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured and fined $250,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to report the short sale indicator for transactions in National Market System (NMS) securities. The findings stated that a programming error caused the firm to exclude the short sale indicator when reporting short sale transactions to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Trade Reporting Facility (TRF). The firm learned of the issue in connection with FINRA’s cycle exam and subsequently corrected the programming error. The findings also stated that the firm failed to report the short sale indicator for transactions in OTC equity securities. A similar programming error caused the firm to erroneously exclude the short sale indicator when reporting short sale transactions to the OTC TRF. The programming error has since been corrected. The findings also included that the firm failed to reasonably supervise trade reporting to the NYSE and OTC TRFs. The firm conducted supervisory reviews of equity trade reporting, but they were not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with FINRA rules with respect to short sale indicator reporting to the NYSE and OTC TRFs. When the firm began reporting to the NYSE and OTC TRF, it reviewed certain test trades, but those reviews did not detect the absence of the short sale indicator. The firm did not conduct any subsequent reviews to determine if the firm was reporting the accurate short sale indicator to the NYSE and OTC TRFs.
Gar Wood Securities, LLC (CRD #138033, Naperville, Illinois) August 18, 2022 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured and fined $100,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to comply with the locate requirement of Rule 203 of Regulation SHO of the Exchange Act. The findings stated that the firm inadvertently configured its delivery-versus-payment (DVP) client accounts to allow short sale orders entered into the firm’s order management systems (OMS) to route for execution without obtaining locates. As a result, the firm failed to obtain locates for short sale orders. The findings also stated that the firm failed to accurately report the capacity symbol for trades. One of the firm’s OMSs was incorrectly coded to send a principal capacity symbol for client agency orders to the reporting party. As a result, the firm caused transactions to be reported to the FINRA TRF with the incorrect capacity. Subsequently, the firm switched all agency order routing to an OMS that was correctly coded to report the proper capacity symbol. The findings also included that the firm failed to reasonably supervise for compliance with locate and trade reporting requirements. The firm’s supervisory system, including its WSPs, was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Rule 203(b) of Regulation SHO. The firm’s supervisory system required that a review for locate information be performed but it inadvertently failed to include a locate review for short sale orders in the firm’s DVP accounts. Further, the firm conducted a locates supervisory review for custodial accounts, but it incorrectly excluded short sales orders that were accepted for execution but did not execute. In addition, the firm lacked a review to confirm all required trade information, such as capacity, was accurately reported to the FINRA TRF.
SG Americas Securities, LLC (CRD #128351, New York, New York) August 10, 2022 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured and fined $325,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to report and inaccurately reported over-the-counter (OTC) options positions to the large options positions reporting system (LOPR). The findings stated that while updating its OTC LOPR, the firm identified that it had only been reporting positions that originated from its U.S.- based activity. The firm had not been reporting instances in which a U.S. customer traded with the firm’s foreign affiliate because its LOPR reporting logic had filtered out, and thus not reported, activity from its non-U.S. affiliate. However, the firm was required to report those positions. The firm’s LOPR also did not recognize that certain customers’ accounts were under common control. As a result, the firm failed to report to the LOPR account groups as acting in-concert and reported positions with an incorrect acting-in-concert number. In addition, the firm’s failure to properly aggregate these account groups led to a failure to report positions. Furthermore, the firm reported OTC options positions to the LOPR without the customers’ tax identification number or tax type. The findings also stated that the firm failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to comply with its LOPR reporting obligations. The firm’s supervisory system related to LOPR reporting did not provide for, and the firm did not conduct, a review of its LOPR reporting logic to determine whether its system captured all reportable positions, including those transactions between U.S. customers and a foreign affiliate of the firm that the firm incorrectly excluded from its LOPR reports. Later, the firm removed the filter that prevented it from including reportable positions involving foreign affiliates and also implemented additional controls and reviews designed to identify potential issues with its LOPR reporting. In addition, the firm’s supervisory system for detecting accounts that were acting in-concert was too restrictive to be effective, because it only linked its acting-in-concert accounts that shared an internal legal entity number or were identified in the system as having the same fund manager. The firm has since implemented changes to its system to more precisely identify accounts required to be designated as acting-in-concert.
Lampert Capital Markets Inc. (CRD #103725, New York, New York) August 29, 2022 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured and fined $10,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it conducted a securities business while under its required minimum net capital by including non-allowable assets in its computation of net capital. The findings stated that the firm misclassified certain payment for order flow fees receivables, ranging between approximately $6,000 and $48,200, as allowable assets in its net capital computations, resulting in the firm overstating its net capital and excess net capital. The firm classified approximately $48,200 in non-allowable payment for order flow fees receivables as allowable assets. Subsequently, the firm operated a securities business while its net capital was approximately $88,500, resulting in a net capital deficiency of approximately $11,500. The findings also stated that the firm failed to make and keep accurate books and records. As a consequence of misclassifying payment for order flow fees receivables as allowable assets, the firm overstated its allowable receivables, and overstated its net capital and excess net capital on six month-end FOCUS reports. The findings also included that the firm failed to file required notices. When its net capital was below its minimum requirement, the firm did not file a notice with FINRA or the SEC. In addition, the firm’s net capital fell below 120 percent of its required minimum net capital, but the firm did not file the required notices.
MOONBOI's Transaction Tallying Tool progressed nicely in April
Hey everyone! This is MOONBOI's dev. It's been a while since I posted anything on Reddit, so I wanted to update you folks on progress made on our transaction tallying tool (TTT) in April. https://moonboi.tools/ttt For those of you unfamiliar, the TTT is our attempt at addressing issues that arise when you day-trade without keeping meticulous notes about each of your transactions. TTT goes through your transaction history, and it finds the ALGO USD value at the time of each of your transactions. Currently, this is optimized to work on DEXes, but I am making progress toward allowing TTT to identify NFT sales & airdropping/staking rewards. TTT also makes an attempt at calculating your gain/loss over the period. That being said, calculating cost-basis and price changes is not a trivial matter, and I'm not going to pretend that we've solved it. Our gain/loss calculations have room for improvement. Without further ado, here are the improvements that we pushed through in the past month:
We added Q1-2022 USD data
We collapsed DEX transactions into single lines whenever possible (rather than the 3-5 transactions TinyMan will spit out or the 16 AlgoFi will)
We have optimized performance and observed at least a 10x performance improvement, which has greatly alleviated the previous 4,000 transaction limit
Multi-wallet functionality has been added! You can now indicate that multiple wallets belong to you, and TTT will know not to calculate gain/loss or change your DCA on assets if you move assets between your own wallets
Transactions are now properly grouped by transaction groups, rather than "best guess" grouping
Data is now represented by year (and UK fiscal year) in separate sheets
Explicit DEX support. The first iterations of TTT tried to just 'guess' when you made a trade on a DEX. After spending enough time on Algorand, I've learned that different DEXes like to handle transactions different ways. As such, I've gone about studying their smart contracts and making explicit logic for each of these DEXes. Currently, the following are supported:
TinyMan (beta): I'm going to call our TinyMan support 'beta'. All transactions from TinyMan are successfully detected and identified at this time. If there is an issue, it's that redeems may not be folded correctly under specific circumstances. I have not found evidence to support this.
AlgoFi DEX transactions (alpha): I have a lot less experience with AlgoFi, and I haven't encountered a wallet that's traded primarily in AlgoFi's DEX to really figure out whether TTT is handling all of these transactions perfectly. That being said, TTT is successfully detecting and identifying AlgoFi transactions, and I think that it's doing it well. I haven't seen evidence of systematic error.
I should note that gain/loss is now only calculated for contract calls that TTT recognizes, which right now are the two above
Our output has been updated to be consistent with what Koinly refers to as the Universal Template. This is a lot more readable than our previous outputs.
This has been a lot of work on our end. To see an example output, check out this link (load may be slow, it's just a Google spreadsheet). There's a lot to be encouraged about here: I believe this will be the final major format update this year, because we've really set ourselves up to generate clean, readable data that is useful for a human and usable by code. I'm presently in the process of talking to a database expert and my front-end guy about building a GUI for 2023 so that an output download is no longer necessary. There's more work to be done, and I intend on improving the TTT substantially along the way before 2023, but my hope and expectation is that we'll be providing you guys with a much more robust tool by 2023 than anything you had available to you in 2022. I'm excited to keep working on this, and I'm excited for MOONBOI's future- even with crypto down, I feel that we've got a lot to look forward to. I look forward to any and all feedback! Final note is to say that we are continuing to work other avenues for growing MOONBOI, so if you haven't, definitely check out our website: https://algomoonboi.com. Thank you!
In July 2015, the largest-sized Bitcoin transactions were made. They each consisted of 1000s of UTXOs and took up 99.9% of their blocks, but cost only $0-15 in fees.
The biggest Bitcoin transactions (in terms of bytesize and UTXO number) ever made were all done in 2015 around the same time as a series of attacks and vulnerability checks for Bitcoin. They were absolutely massive and hit the limits of blocksize and UTXO number. This is what they looked like:
There were 9 of these transactions on Aug 1. They each had 20000 input UTXOs, which is the limit for a single transaction.
They were useless wasted block space sent to OP_RETURN without any metadata. I don't know the exact history behind this one, but all signs point to another attack similar to the ones a month earlier.
July 2015 Flood Attacks
Back in July 2015, there were half a dozen SIGHASH_ALL transactions that took up 99.9% of the block space. They paid $0-15 BTC in fees and were sent to OP_RETURN. In comparison, most block fees nowadays around $2000-5000. This was done as a Proof-of-concept DoS attack that ended up being way more successful than it meant to be.
Signature Hashing Vulnerability
In addition to the wasted space, for each of the 5000 inputs, miners had to hash the entire 1MB transaction. Some nodes were delayed 10-20 seconds hashing the signatures due to a design-flaw by Satoshi Nakamoto that made counting signatures an O(N2) instead of O(N) process. This also wasted ~1.2GB of hashed data to compute it, and lead to 80K transactions being stuck in the mempool. To this day, OP_RETURN transactions are frowned upon. This vulnerability, CVE-2013-2292, has been known since 2013. Lead core developer, Gavin Andresen, proposed fix to this in BIP-101, but that got withdrawn. Eventually, this along with other disputes, lead to his leaving the Bitcoin community along with many other Bitcoin developers. The vulnerability is still not entirely fixed, but it was mostly mitigated by BIP-143 as part of the SegWit update. No one is exploiting this anymore.
@AP: BREAKING: With 50.9% of votes tallied in Brazil election, presidential candidates close: 50.3% for far-right incumbent Bolsonaro, 49.7% for leftist rival Lula da Silva. https://t.co/t6EzS2w68k
State Farm will become a strategic investor in ADT by committing $1.2 billion to acquire 133 million shares of ADT at $9 per share. To avoid dilution from the State Farm investment by using the proceeds to buy back up to 133.3 million shares of its stock at $9 apiece. Transaction Closes Oct 20
@AP: BREAKING: With 50.9% of votes tallied in Brazil election, presidential candidates close: 50.3% for far-right incumbent Bolsonaro, 49.7% for leftist rival Lula da Silva. https://t.co/PimcQrxpse
TIL that notched sticks became common currency for transactions and debts in medieval Europe because of the chronic shortage of coins and widespread illiteracy. The "split tally" was based on a Stone Age memory aid device and was even valid for tax collection under Henry I of England.
Forex trabalha Mumbai.<br />de: youth4work - 9 dias atrás.<br />1) Deve ser capaz de gerenciar todas as funções, funcionários e operações diárias de uma filial local; desenvolve planos de vendas para garantir que as metas de vendas e serviços da filial sejam plenamente alcançadas. .. 2) Para garantir o empate com. negociação forex em ... May 12, 2016 - Do you know the importance to open a #binaryoption #demoaccount? Find out how you can save al lot of #money and be succesful on #forex http://sumo.ly ... Forex Insider Parsing Error Error and Warning Messages . As mentioned earlier, Forex Insider uses API data from MyFxBook. Forex Insider ... 9 coinrivet.com Coin Rivet - Latest Bitcoin, Blockchain & Cryptocurrency News Coin Rivet is a dedicated digital currency global news site and an independent publication covering blockchain technology, blockchain jobs, blockchain-based cryptocurrencies, distributed ledger technology, decentralised applications, the internet of finance, wallets, exchanges and ICOs. Este corretor é baseado no Canadá e finge ser o corretor de crescimento mais rápido no mundo do forex. Eles têm sido negociados forex desde 2004. Questrade é um membro da Associação de Revendedores de Investimento do Canadá, o Canadian Investor Protection Fund, também é uma parte da Toronto Stock Exchange e da Bolsa de Montreal Inc. Além de fornecer a facilidade de negociação ... 150,000 which is the aggregate of the tax on income from binary options in india deduction that may be claimed under sections 80C, 80CCC and. Income Tax: Income from futures and options is business income if trading is regular 6 hours ago With 60,975 new Covid-19 cases, India’s tally surges past 3.1 million; recovery rate at 75.9%. Mar 20, 2019 · Under section 54 of the Income Tax Act ... So, say no to losses in your trading and get prepare to make consistent profit like professional traders in MCX, NSE, NCDEX, MCX SX, FOREX, COMEX markets with the help of RichLiveTrade one of the best and accurate buy sell signal software and perfect technical analysis indicator systems available in market now. Using of RichLiveTrade buy sell signal software is simple, no need to any prior ...
Recording of multicurrency transactions in tally 9
How to adjust rate of exchange in tally erp 9 release 6.3 How to adjust forex gain/loss in tally erp 9 release 6.3 How to use multiple currency in export or ... Tally 9 has become very advance accounting software .In this software you can easily record foreign currency transactions and also calculate profit and loss from foreign exchange . We provide tally ERP 9 online classes. It is a free tally accounting course. So you can learn and study tally accounting online. It is Full Step by Step Tally video Tutorial in Hindi. This Tally ... Tally.ERP 9 has a handy feature to manage International trade and keep track of International receivables & payables. Tally.ERP 9 makes it easy to manage mul... Multi-currency feature in Tally. ERP 9 From Gateway of Tally Press button F11 ERP 9 From Gateway of Tally Press button F11 F1-- Accounting Features --enable the option 'Allow Multi-Currency '. Tally संबंधित सभी वीडियो का लिंक नीचे दिया गया है :- How to create company : https://youtu.be ... How I Mastered Forex In 1 Year In this video Jay Wayne shows you what it takes to be successful in trading forex. In 1 year he was able to make 15K from a $3... Tally.ERP 9 makes it easy to manage multiple currencies, automatic calculations of exchange rates, automatic conversion of any currency used to record a transaction to the currency of the account ... GST Export-Forex Gain Loss Adjustment in Tally ERP 9 Part-51Tally GST Export Multiple Currencies - Duration: 10:44. Career Planet Computer Education 34,197 views 10:44 Read its text version at http://svtuition.com/how-to-record-all-figures-in-dinar-in-tally-erp-9/
![An inscribed gold-inlaid bronze tiger tally (Hufu), Qin dynasty (221 BC–206 BC) or later. Length 3⅞ in., 9.8 cm. Sold at Sotheby's in 2022 for 869,400 USD. [2048x2048]](https://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/HvAmNb8A8Vmkirm7St7yZpTZK2-D9x5rYi5le6hy-tk.jpg "An inscribed gold-inlaid bronze tiger tally (Hufu), Qin dynasty (221 BC–206 BC) or later. Length 3⅞ in., 9.8 cm. Sold at Sotheby's in 2022 for 869,400 USD. [2048x2048]")
![[World] - With 50.9% of votes tallied in Brazil election, candidates very close with 50.3% for Bolsonaro, 49.7% for Lula da Silva | ABC](https://external-preview.redd.it/VPuqb0V72x13cC4sPSC1kjy2j-Mef8mWZLmpVepOclo.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=e2643f70022c0707f2c417e28019d663f9114c31 "[World] - With 50.9% of votes tallied in Brazil election, candidates very close with 50.3% for Bolsonaro, 49.7% for Lula da Silva | ABC")
